<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rape Juror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/</link>
	<description>Reporters' Blog for the Evening Sun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvs</title>
		<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/comment-page-1/#comment-23043</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/#comment-23043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Dr. Doren isn’t sure, pointing out, for example, that convicted rapists are more likely to re-offend in the years immediately after release, and more likely to commit other violent crimes. “If we’re concerned about violence generically, it’s rapists we should be concerned about” in the short term, he said.&quot;
Pulled from The Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-likely-are-sex-offenders-to-repeat-their-crimes-258/
And before you say it&#039;s a blog, its backed up with sources
 A 1991 study published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology stated that 43 percent of convicted child molesters released from mental institutions went on to commit new violent or sexual offenses within an average of six years. 
Also, you would do well to read this article: Structural behavioural analysis as a basis for discriminating between genuine and simulated rape allegations.
Authors:Marshall, Ben C.1 ben.marshall@ucl.ac.uk
Alison, Laurence J.2
Source:Journal of Investigative Psychology &amp; Offender Profiling; Jan2006, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p21-34, 14p, 1 chart, 3 graphs
I don&#039;t know if you have access to ACADEMIC JOURNAL sources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dr. Doren isn’t sure, pointing out, for example, that convicted rapists are more likely to re-offend in the years immediately after release, and more likely to commit other violent crimes. “If we’re concerned about violence generically, it’s rapists we should be concerned about” in the short term, he said.&#8221;<br />
Pulled from The Wall Street Journal<br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-likely-are-sex-offenders-to-repeat-their-crimes-258/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-likely-are-sex-offenders-to-repeat-their-crimes-258/</a><br />
And before you say it&#8217;s a blog, its backed up with sources<br />
 A 1991 study published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology stated that 43 percent of convicted child molesters released from mental institutions went on to commit new violent or sexual offenses within an average of six years.<br />
Also, you would do well to read this article: Structural behavioural analysis as a basis for discriminating between genuine and simulated rape allegations.<br />
Authors:Marshall, Ben C.1 <a href="mailto:ben.marshall@ucl.ac.uk">ben.marshall@ucl.ac.uk</a><br />
Alison, Laurence J.2<br />
Source:Journal of Investigative Psychology &amp; Offender Profiling; Jan2006, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p21-34, 14p, 1 chart, 3 graphs<br />
I don&#8217;t know if you have access to ACADEMIC JOURNAL sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptikal</title>
		<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/comment-page-1/#comment-23037</link>
		<dc:creator>skeptikal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/#comment-23037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While in some cases it may be hard to tell if it is he or she who is telling the truth, what the victim gets to experience afterwards in court may be just as bad as the attack itself. In a place where everybody knows everyones business it may be hard for the vic to report it because of no privacy. I heard more than half go unreported sometime ago and i could see why someone would not want to go to trial. If someone is found guilty of making a false statement in this area then steps to cleanse the arrest record of the accused should take place and perhaps the accused would be entitled to a retraction in the newspaper/TV. I do not beleive rape is a crime the victim ever gets over,not ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While in some cases it may be hard to tell if it is he or she who is telling the truth, what the victim gets to experience afterwards in court may be just as bad as the attack itself. In a place where everybody knows everyones business it may be hard for the vic to report it because of no privacy. I heard more than half go unreported sometime ago and i could see why someone would not want to go to trial. If someone is found guilty of making a false statement in this area then steps to cleanse the arrest record of the accused should take place and perhaps the accused would be entitled to a retraction in the newspaper/TV. I do not beleive rape is a crime the victim ever gets over,not ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FalseRapeArchivist</title>
		<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/comment-page-1/#comment-23031</link>
		<dc:creator>FalseRapeArchivist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/#comment-23031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tyler: I understand, and thanks for the clarification.

Obvs said: &quot;The reason sex offenders are treated the way that they are is because they are statistically likely to commit the offense again.&quot;  Kindly furnish objectively verifiable data to back up this wild assertion, madam.  Even the committee members who objected to Congress&#039; rush to enact terrible Fed. Rule Evidence 413 didn&#039;t believe THAT fairy tale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler: I understand, and thanks for the clarification.</p>
<p>Obvs said: &#8220;The reason sex offenders are treated the way that they are is because they are statistically likely to commit the offense again.&#8221;  Kindly furnish objectively verifiable data to back up this wild assertion, madam.  Even the committee members who objected to Congress&#8217; rush to enact terrible Fed. Rule Evidence 413 didn&#8217;t believe THAT fairy tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/comment-page-1/#comment-23030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/#comment-23030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like I said I don&#039;t know what to make of the issue but I understand the plight of both prosecution and defense. I made the remark about instincts because at least in my experience and as you&#039;ve also explained, rape charges can carry an unjustifiable weight of prejudice to them. I meant the remarks more as a criticism (and truth) of human nature. I was not condoning its practice, I was simply trying to look at the dilemma from both sides because I think it’s important to understand the legal and social challenges associated.

 I do believe men are the target of false rape charges and a larger percentage are targeted with lesser allegations such as sexual harassment.  I also believe that actual rapes and associated sex crimes are often under reported and that true victims are frightened at the idea of losing public credibility.

 Which begs the question: How to encourage real victims to come forward while actively suppressing those that would exploit the system through false accusation. 

I wish I had an answer to this one, but I don’t. Just take it a case at a time. Fight the urge to lynch an accused person because what we’re really doing is hanging reason and justice out to dry. 

While at the same time, embracing the difficulty of prosecution and offering sincere sympathy to a victim who may be utterly lost in our system of reasonable doubt.

I appreciate your intelligent remarks and I’m glad to see the issue is being discussed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said I don&#8217;t know what to make of the issue but I understand the plight of both prosecution and defense. I made the remark about instincts because at least in my experience and as you&#8217;ve also explained, rape charges can carry an unjustifiable weight of prejudice to them. I meant the remarks more as a criticism (and truth) of human nature. I was not condoning its practice, I was simply trying to look at the dilemma from both sides because I think it’s important to understand the legal and social challenges associated.</p>
<p> I do believe men are the target of false rape charges and a larger percentage are targeted with lesser allegations such as sexual harassment.  I also believe that actual rapes and associated sex crimes are often under reported and that true victims are frightened at the idea of losing public credibility.</p>
<p> Which begs the question: How to encourage real victims to come forward while actively suppressing those that would exploit the system through false accusation. </p>
<p>I wish I had an answer to this one, but I don’t. Just take it a case at a time. Fight the urge to lynch an accused person because what we’re really doing is hanging reason and justice out to dry. </p>
<p>While at the same time, embracing the difficulty of prosecution and offering sincere sympathy to a victim who may be utterly lost in our system of reasonable doubt.</p>
<p>I appreciate your intelligent remarks and I’m glad to see the issue is being discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvs</title>
		<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/comment-page-1/#comment-23025</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/#comment-23025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ah, a blame the victim mentality. The reason sex offenders are treated the way that they are is because they are statistically likely to commit the offense again. Also, NO means NO, regardless of whether the girl was drunk or not.
I think you make a lot of excellent points, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, a blame the victim mentality. The reason sex offenders are treated the way that they are is because they are statistically likely to commit the offense again. Also, NO means NO, regardless of whether the girl was drunk or not.<br />
I think you make a lot of excellent points, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FalseRapeArchivist</title>
		<link>http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/comment-page-1/#comment-23024</link>
		<dc:creator>FalseRapeArchivist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evesun.com/2008/08/07/rape-juror/#comment-23024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am appalled by these comments.  This man does a disservice to the innocent men falsely accused of rape and he would do well to study the news accounts at my Web site http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/  It is clear he thinks false rape claims are a rarity.  
 
Objectively verifiable data indicates that at least 9 percent and probably closer to half of all rape claims are false.  The crime of false reporting of raport is rarely charged and is the criminal justice system&#039;s dirty little secret.  (The stats I&#039;ve set forth are not fanatical Men&#039;s Rights Advocate figures -- I would suggest he read Prof. K.C. Johnson&#039;s book on the Duke lacrosse non-rape case which traces all the major rape studies and concludes false claims are at least 9 percent and probably closer to half of all reported &quot;rapes.&quot;  That book, by the way, has been praised by virtually every liberal newspaper in America, including the NY Times, which the book skewers for its coverage of the Duke case.)  Yet the crime of making a false rape report has become so embroiled in the radical feminist sexual assault milieu -- as this man seems to be as well -- that it has been largely, and improperly, removed from the public discourse about rape. Sexual assault counselors often disingenuously refer to the fact of false rape accusations as a &quot;myth.&quot; Denigrating the experience of the falsely accused by dismissing their victimization as a myth is not merely dishonest but morally grotesque.  

Sir, you should not be a juror deciding rape cases.  In a he said-she said dispute over consent, if both parties have furnished plausible explanations, it is your duty not to convict.  How dare you say that a lot of people (and I assume you mean YOU) &quot;go with our instincts . . . . Which rarely favor a defendant.&quot;

Absolutely disgraceful.  Pray that you are never false accused of rape, sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am appalled by these comments.  This man does a disservice to the innocent men falsely accused of rape and he would do well to study the news accounts at my Web site <a href="http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/</a>  It is clear he thinks false rape claims are a rarity.  </p>
<p>Objectively verifiable data indicates that at least 9 percent and probably closer to half of all rape claims are false.  The crime of false reporting of raport is rarely charged and is the criminal justice system&#8217;s dirty little secret.  (The stats I&#8217;ve set forth are not fanatical Men&#8217;s Rights Advocate figures &#8212; I would suggest he read Prof. K.C. Johnson&#8217;s book on the Duke lacrosse non-rape case which traces all the major rape studies and concludes false claims are at least 9 percent and probably closer to half of all reported &#8220;rapes.&#8221;  That book, by the way, has been praised by virtually every liberal newspaper in America, including the NY Times, which the book skewers for its coverage of the Duke case.)  Yet the crime of making a false rape report has become so embroiled in the radical feminist sexual assault milieu &#8212; as this man seems to be as well &#8212; that it has been largely, and improperly, removed from the public discourse about rape. Sexual assault counselors often disingenuously refer to the fact of false rape accusations as a &#8220;myth.&#8221; Denigrating the experience of the falsely accused by dismissing their victimization as a myth is not merely dishonest but morally grotesque.  </p>
<p>Sir, you should not be a juror deciding rape cases.  In a he said-she said dispute over consent, if both parties have furnished plausible explanations, it is your duty not to convict.  How dare you say that a lot of people (and I assume you mean YOU) &#8220;go with our instincts . . . . Which rarely favor a defendant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely disgraceful.  Pray that you are never false accused of rape, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
